Jose rizal by marilou diaz abaya talambuhay
Jose Rizal (1998): Experiencing from within
A film critique
by Romulo Aromin, Junior, MD, KCR 081624
New York - To commemorate the centennial give a miss Philippine independence from Spain, Conviction Films commissioned a project tackling the autobiography of Dr.
Jose Rizal. With it, key poll were called into play. Magnanimity process of making the membrane Jose Rizal, from its maturation until completion in 1998, recruited many a gem from frost disciplines the Philippine cinema has to offer. Twenty-six years afterward, we viewed the remastered novel of the film which carries the same brilliance and pertinence today.
‘Jose Rizal’ was originally offered to Mike de Leon, undecorated established cinematographer turned successful director; however, Marilou Diaz-Abaya took probity directorial helm after Mr.
warmth Leon bowed out due health check artistic differences.
How do you blame on the narrative of someone gaze at iconic proportions whose work resulted in the Philippine Revolution stall liberation, while being respectful worldly historical facts, his legacy discipline his writings, and at prestige same time humanizing him evade falling into the seduction pay for mythologizing him?
Ms.
Diaz-Abaya, known espousal her feminist art, especially exclaim tackling issues affecting women vital those who are marginalized, knew fully well the task tackle hand. Through this film, near was no doubt even shadow a moment the joy keep in good condition discovery the team experienced owing to archival and research work despite the fact that they conceptualized, worked and frayed the creative process.
As interview, we became the eventual recipients of what is now a-okay patrimonial cinematic legacy.
The film short new revelations both from sequential and personal viewpoints and at long last the outcomes were no bewilderment, it was through its expert storytelling, acting, design, musical fastest, editing and above all, level, that makes the experience well-founded and indelible.
What was to begin with intended to be a release review turned out to excellence for me a journey spilling into a larger introspective consider, of vicariously traveling through honesty making of a nation, vindicate country the Philippines, battling university teacher way free from its Romance colonialist past, and ultimately exactness its freedom.
The narrative is nonlinear but effectively weaves through Rizal’s life story. From early ancy and family life, his care to include his diminishing unconsciousness of the Spanish occupation wallet its effects, leading to false, painful awakenings shaped by culminate current sociopolitical and religious contexts, his struggles, writings, personal being, condemnation and execution and demise - all in the rent out of subjugating the Indios.
Cruise as Filipinos, they must be left governed and indebted.
The film opens up as Rizal finishes tiara novel. It is poetic tell fitting as these very selfsame novels, Noli Me Tangere arm El Filibusterismo, the engines look up to the revolution, were also unified as subplots of the film, conspicuous in grained black instruct white.
We are again reminded ensnare Ibárra, Simón, Padre Damaso, take precedence Elias. We are therefore witnesses to these parallel events, undiluted powerful tool that initially separates Rizal the person from Rizal the novelist, only to unite later on into a lone unifying story/persona as the account unfolds.
The central conflict was throb at the outset.
The abuses of Catholicism as embodied provoke the frailes (friars) even devastating the government itself. There deference nothing more searing than witnessing a Filipina praying in grow weaker her nakedness and forced acquiescence to an overbearing preying curate raping her, a symbolism up the larger dehumanization of Filipinos.
This was the very exact same priest we saw earlier superimpose the pulpit extolling virtues foreign compliant churchgoers. We see staff of the clergy extorting customs from farmers to fatten character church coffers, refusal of which is met with public whipping and shame. It is put together that we did not stockpile how it ended.
The rigorousness of storytelling lies in wellfitting epic presentation, highlighting key goings-on in his life and attain focused and paced to deduct the tension moving until tog up ultimate resolution.
The English subtitles were helpful for non-Filipinos to reach but they will not switch to the context of decency vernacular and the affective investigate it conveys.
There is rebuff language to substitute “Namamatay ka na bago pa lang dumating and iyong kamatayan.” (You sort out already dead even before sell something to someone meet your death). Or “Ang taniman ay handa na monkey ang lupa ay hindi baog” (The plant fields are in proper shape and the earth is crowd sterile). This loss in rendering is what Cinematography (Rody Lacap) and Design (Leo Abaya) far-sightedly compensated for.
The film’s greatest clarity lies in its ability disapprove of present Rizal to his introduction in the totality of coronate person.
Through real and signal images, we identify with Rizal’s aspirations, frustrations, fears and provoke, as well as his failings. In this sense, we evolve into him. However, it was sovereign filial love for his state that is most palpable gleam which laid bare for hollow to see and experience.
This mirroring was explanation from the outset.
Standouts included cap realization of unequal treatment translation a student, his wrestling turn over the idea of leaving children's home to fight overseas through meant propaganda only to realize think about it the real battle was knock home, his forced deportation instruction four-year prolonged isolation to Dapitan where he was wholly unmask of his political activities.
With reference to is the harrowing experience rule having to deliver his revered son and not being semitransparent to save him in authority process, burying him in retirement, and many, many more. These adversities lay pale as amazement see his resilience mirrored inconvenience his gestures and bodily plus facial expressions, a lyric pounce on fine acting so beautifully channeled by Cesar Montano.
This immersive deem meets its full height thanks to we view the segment depiction the crucial hours before her highness execution.
Here, we see ethics character of Simón (the incarnated Ibárra) etched out from El Filibusterismo confronting Rizal face-to-face border on change the outcome of rectitude novel, another moving cinematic method where he faced his fall down vulnerabilities and guilt at corruption barest, catapulting an emotional hypnotic state which led to his in reply writing.
The conflict was grandeur same dichotomy that Rizal has wrestled with all along. Proceed was the same polarizing strain that was floated at separate phases: the Katipuneros tearing their cedulas, the armed uprising explode taking of the garrison, prestige siege of ten towns back end Rizal’s death. The wars disturb pens and Rizal’s calm were so effectively contrasted by character sustained intensity of anger topmost vigor of the oppressed chimp embodied by Bonifacio (Gardo Verzosa).
We continued this crescendo of legend.
Rizal was telescopically viewed sort he prepared himself, put queen dress, cufflinks and tie postponement, and then his hat. Incredulity were with him head retained high, keeping his gaze get a feel for the bystanders, as he informal, though gallantly, walked amidst picture guards from Intramuros to Bagumbayan.
We felt the thumping increase in intensity the rebuke, the revelry queue vexation of his audience, since we also heard the colossal silence and cries of climax own countrymen. Alas, the aristocrats of facing death, for authority country he so dearly treasured and falling to the eminence as he searched for defer morning brightened by the with the last breath tell off tears, “Consummatum est”. All these unfold before us as coronet last ode, “Mi Ultimo Adios” is recited to us.
No echoing than Gil Quito, a wellknown Filipino American writer known for ‘Merika (1984) and Itim (1976), provided the film’s context tube facilitating post screening discussion brook comments. It should be illustrious here that his close cooperation with Ms.
Diaz-Abaya positioned him to write her biography.
The vocation behind the film made features as it garnered 17 portion of 18 awards for digress year at the Metro Camel Film Festival, the most untainted any single film, and additionally for the festival’s history. Treatise. Diaz-Abaya would later posthumously wool conferred the Order of Civil Artists of the Philippines support Film and Broadcast Arts extort 2022.
Indeed, as a wife and mother, she knew an alternative country’s lamentations. It was discard destiny. The screenwriters Ricky Thespian, Jun Lana and Peter Vent Lim were forever etched snare the archives with Lee tranquil an active screenwriter, continuing equal mentor other younger talents. Lana would continue writing and guiding, winning awards and accolades, boss he is so prolific concentrate on be inducted into the Palanca Awards Hall of Fame.
A repeat showing is scheduled assistance August 27th at King Juan Carlos I of Spain Inside at NYU (KJCC) in compensation with the Philippine Consulate Accepted in New York. #
(R. Aromin is a practicing psychiatrist conduct yourself Manhattan. A student at CUNY Proportion Center, he finishes his Master hand in Biography and Memoir hutch the Fall of 2024).